Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brain pong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:58, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brain pong

Non-notable game. Appears that WP:MADEUP applies. From article, ..."incredibly new, relatively unknown sport, references and citations are unavailable." ttonyb1 (talk) 05:00, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Indeed, the article by it's own admission fails WP:V. Cool3 (talk) 05:03, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Edited. Although WP:MADEUP does not apply, I see how this article fails to overcome WP:V. Could this article be moved, save deleted? Eggbandit57 (talk) 05:27, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:MADEUP applies for that very reason. It does, after all, point out exactly how our content policies apply in this sort of case. No sources existing means no article. That is policy here at Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not for documenting the heretofore undocumented. That must happen outside of Wikipedia, beforehand. Uncle G (talk) 04:27, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: "relatively unknown sport, references and citations are unavailable" = Fails WP:N. Classic WP:NFT game. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:33, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:NFT. Pastor Theo (talk) 05:56, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:07, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:NFT. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:02, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.