Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BreakingPoint Systems
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- BreakingPoint Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant claim of notability. Also appears to be WP:ARTSPAM - page creator, User:Kyleflaherty, has a vested interest - see [1] Bazonka (talk) 14:20, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Looking at the article's references, there does seem to be plenty of independent coverage. Including mentions in mainstream news sources such as the Daily Mail (the second most read English language newspaper website in the world). Pit-yacker (talk) 14:56, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The claimed Daily Mail source does not appear to contain the string "BreakingPoint", and would appear to be about network security generally. The rest of the sources are press release based coverage of company-announced "breakthroughs", startup-related announcements, routine financing announcements, and petty trade awards from industry analysts. (Hint: if it says a leading network security provider and worldwide leader of unified threat management (UTM) solutions or the like, it's not an independent source.) - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:01, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.