Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breaking the Code

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 17:12, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Breaking the Code

Delete nn play, although the author is a bluelink, he is not the super high notability author that all of his works are presumed notable, hence this play's notability rests on its own (notability) merits which are found wanting. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:59, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. NYT TIME TV movie w/ Derek Jacobi, won award etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. Before saying "found" it might do one good to actually "search"? --Dhartung | Talk 18:18, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Broadway production nommed for three Tonys and two Drama Desks. --Dhartung | Talk 18:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Cleary meets WP:N and per Dhartung's links. PeterSymonds | talk 18:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, with a hearty endorsement of Dhartung's comments. —Quasirandom (talk) 19:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as above, I suppose the subject is notable, but the article is in dire need of expansion. (It's barely a single sentence right now.) Any volunteers? Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 20:18, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:30, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly notable. I just added a link to the review from Time, but much more could be added without too much difficulty. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 12:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.