Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breck Stewart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:37, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Breck Stewart

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

—Non-Notable porn star and singer, no independent reliable sources. Article comes off as promotional and was seemingly created by subject link and maybe have been edited by others connected to him as some of the other edits were done by usernames that mostly or solely edited this article.Wikiuser20102011 (talk) 19:57, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A BLP without a single independent reliable source. All the references in the article are published by the subject, are advertising for the subject, or are from IMDB. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 21:47, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:44, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I simply see nothing better. Pinging past users GermanJoe and Guy1890. SwisterTwister talk 05:45, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do yourself a favor my friend and stop pinging people at AfD. That's what article alerts are for. Guy1890 (talk) 05:26, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - two albums, Reality show MoonDaze TV 2011. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 20:45, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The two albums have gotten no mainstream press or even mentioned by the porn press, nor has it charted on any of the notable music charts. The "Reality show" MoonDaze TV was made by Stewart himself and uploaded to his youtube channel only. It also has no coverage elsewhere. Wikiuser20102011 (talk) 21:33, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Self-released albums and self-produced, self-posted youtube videos which receive no independent coverage don't support any claim of notability. The faux TV program averages about 1K views per episode, which makes the subject perhaps 10% as notable as the average YouTube cat. Purrhaps Subtropical-man will next improve the encyclopedia by writing bios of Mittens (kitten), Scrunchytail, Mrs. Whiskerlicker, and Oopy, felines who are far more prominent in the YouTube realm of "reality TV" than this subject. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 11:54, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, above arguments are convincing. I withdraw my vote for keep. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 22:11, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.