- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Brett Conti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can find no evidence that the subject has received the significant coverage by independent, reliable sources required to meet the general notability guideline. I haven't been able to find any coverage that could be used to verify the information in the article - save a couple of videos of someone named "Brett Conti" skateboarding ([1], [2]). The main claim of notability in the article would seem to be per WP:ATHLETE - competing at the professional level of the sport but without anything to verify even that fact I don't see how we can keep a biography of a living person (and minor at that) which has remained unsourced for almost a year. Frankly - videos aside - I'm not 100% convinced the article's not at least in portion a hoax. None of the listed videos get anything on Google except in relation to this article (examples: [3], [4], [5]) Guest9999 (talk) 01:53, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete: Truth be told, I can find no outright claim of notability, and I find farcical that a 16 year old claims to be a "professional" skateboarder. Boot this puppy. Ravenswing 10:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of verification.
I do not think a speedy deletion is appropriate however, since the article asserts notability through the claim of being professional, satisfying WP:ATHLETE. This claim, however, is without source.WP:HOAX. Jujutacular talkcontribs 15:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Just out of curiosity, where does it say that the word "professional" constitutes a claim of notability? I work for a living; that makes me a "professional," without conferring notability. Neither does being a professional satisfy WP:ATHLETE; the current interpretation of "fully professional" excludes semi-pro leagues, low minor leagues and amateurs who receive stipends (such as in junior hockey leagues). Ravenswing 00:44, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply Good point. Being a non-league sport, a claim of notability through skateboarding would have to be "a competition of equivalent standing" per WP:ATHLETE. Comment stricken. Jujutacular talkcontribs 22:51, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- In order to not meet speedy delete criterion A7 an article has to contain a credible claim as to the importance or significance of its topic - a lower bar than notability. Guest9999 (talk) 22:28, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.