Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian's Return

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 11:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nom - speedied once already; no changes made since last speedied; this is only a one line "article"; this could just as easily be merged in with the author's article. Rklawton 17:00, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I've read the whole series of these books- it's a very well-known series. I don't even need to read the articles to remember that at least one or two of them received some very big awards. --- RockMFR 23:57, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Subject is notable, but this "article" is a non-article of one sentence... but I don't know which would be better, delete to create a useful redlink or redirect to Hatchet (novel) until/unless someone is willing to write more than one vague sentence about the book. B.Wind 00:02, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Article is now wikified and stubbed. --- RockMFR 00:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep the stub per RockMFR. It looks much better, thanks! B.Wind 01:24, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Sequel to a very notable book.Skynet1216 02:20, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question - is this particular book notable? Why not create a single article per series? Rklawton 23:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep — Published books, with notable authors are generally notable. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 09:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.