Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridge Publications (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:34, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bridge Publications (software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company appears to fail WP:CORP. I did several Google searches, and after intense filtering to remove scientology related results, I came up with [1] as the most relevant results, and that shows nothing in the way of significant reliable secondary source coverage. However, given the intense filtering I had to do, it's entirely possible I missed stuff somewhere so I'm bringing this to AfD instead of PRODing. Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 18:46, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 19:02, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 19:03, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No claim to notability made. OSborn^arf_contribs. 19:13, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) MrKIA11 (talk) 04:05, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This software article lacks 3rd party refs to establish notability. Dialectric (talk) 15:16, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.