Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridges to Belarus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, no coverage in reliable sources to verify or establish notability. Davewild (talk) 14:52, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bridges to Belarus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Promotional charity article of a non-notable charity, reads like a leaflet. SGGH ^speak! 18:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:22, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Endorse nomination unless article is rewritten, referenced and notability established. --Richhoncho (talk) 05:52, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep not only does it read like a leaflet, I strongly suspect that it is a leaflet. THAT SAID, it has quite a few google hits (not that the google popularity contest means much) and I do believe it's notable. Let's either keep and clean up, or perhaps merge into List of Chernobyl-related charities (which is in serious need of help too, by the way). L'Aquatique[talk] 06:26, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unsourced so unmergable, and the prior commentator's strong suspicion that is a copyright violation is a reason to delete. GRBerry 21:17, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.