Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooks Information Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango 123 23:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brooks Information Technology

Article on company with no assertion of notability and almost no content; speedy tag deleted twice without explanation NawlinWiki 16:28, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I don't understand the reason for deleting this article. This is a known company, and the article is factual with no spin or bias. Wikipedia is not paper and as such, this article does no harm in being kept, and in fact adds towards a healthy base of IT companies --see Category:Information_technology_consulting_firms. In my personal opinion, I feel that if people put their effort in to creating and editing articles, rather than trying to delete them (not including junk and spam, of course), Wikipedia would be a much more productive place, --23:51, 8 June 2006 (UTC)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.177.214.231 (contribs).
Comment - I agree, I think we should delete all private company articles... that way, no one will know anything... also, I think that all articles on anything else on this site should be removed, too. ---obvious sarcasm--- Guest 22:57, 8 June 2006 (UTC)—The preceding comment, with faked signature, was also added by 72.177.214.231 (contribs).[reply]
Delete per WP:NOT, promotion. Also, has around 6 unique G-hits. Doesn't seem notable. Yanksox 16:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Mr Stephen 16:59, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Vanity - contributor is BrooksIT, same as the company name. Trebor 17:00, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The company I work for, in the same business, is considerably larger and would not qualify under WP:CORP. - Fan1967 17:12, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NN/vanity —M e ts501^talk 17:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete obvious advertising Dpbsmith (talk) 18:41, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless someone can verify that it actually meets wp:corp. youngamerican (talk) 18:55, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for reasons given above. DVD+ R/W 00:28, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.