- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:30, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Brotest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable neologism. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 08:17, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as obvious neologism. Also, because Wikipedia is not a dictionary. JogCon (talk) 15:31, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 22:52, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Protologism at best, more likely just nonsense. LadyofShalott 23:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per JogCon. Cnilep (talk) 00:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.