Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brotherhood of Objectivist Thinkers

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. No legitimate keep votes, but something this much sock-supported would be deleted anyway. — JIP | Talk 05:28, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The article is likely vanity, or at least non-notable. No encyclopedic merit and very NPOV. Bkwillwm 06:21, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, I'm both libertarian and objectivist, and I support their cause, but founded in 2005 and zero google hits makes me say nn. Usrnme h8er 11:14, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Looks to me like vanity, and unverifiable. Delete unless this organization is shown to be notable in some verifiable way. Friday (talk) 14:36, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete NN. Does this even exist outside Wikipedia ? Groeck 18:37, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Do not delete, this organization is veritable and growing in influence here on Long Island. I attended two meetings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.122.102.1 (talk • contribs) 2005-09-22 22:58:20 UTC
• Delete. A brand-new group, no mention of number of members but zero Google hits hints to a very low number. NN. Owen× ☎ 00:05, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Do not delete, I've seen them talk at several conference halls, these leaders are nothing but genius' of the next generation! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.85.175 (talk • contribs) 2005-09-23 00:10:38 UTC
• Do not delete, I've seen them talk at several conference halls, these leaders are nothing but genius' of the next generation! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.180.83.6 (talk • contribs) 2005-09-23 00:16:43 UTC
• Don't Delete,Dan Ryan is an upstanding New English gentleman who would never attempt to corrupt Wikipedia with so called nonesense. I say let this article stay as a means to spread Mr. Ryan's good news of Neo-Nazism and attempts to revive the Ku Klux Klan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.194.18.104 (talk • contribs) 2005-09-23 00:22:27 UTC
• Delete. Pure narcissism at its worst, this entry is nothing but an attempt by the founders to show off. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.194.0.96 (talk • contribs) 2005-09-23 00:26:05 UTC
• Delete. Dan Ryan enjoys long walks on the beach and biting the head off of innocent puppies. Therefore, I have no choice but to recommend this page's deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.194.0.96 (talk • contribs) 2005-09-23 00:29:34 UTC
• Anonymous users may like to read Wikipedia:Verifiability and WP:VAIN. If this actually exists we need more proof than your word. Delete as vanity/advertising for new organization with zero internet presence. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:41, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Don't Delete, I have attended various meetings of the Brotherhood of Objectivist Thinkers, and I have found them to be nothing but wonderful. I love the environment, that they strive to create, in which a person may reach his own conclusions. And this is not a vanity page, there is nothing on it but the information about the Brotherhood. The founders have not used this page as a blog. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.226.195.54 (talk • contribs) 2005-09-23 09:46:11 UTC
• Delete Sockpuppets aside, there is no evidence that these "leaders" are credible other than in their own minds. Denni☯ 02:22, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• The article cites no sources, and a search turns up no sources. Unverifiable. Delete. Uncle G 05:59, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Per User:Uncle G & User:Denni.Crypticfirefly 05:14, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Do not delete I am a good friend of the Brotherhood, although not a member at the moment I plan on joining. Dan Ryan is a good hearted, hard working man who does not wish to lie about anything he just wants to publicize the Brotherhood by telling us what it is about. There is nothing wrong with that. The Brotherhood has strongly supported me in the past, including providing for my security at some points. They are men/women of high propriety and have done nothing wrong.(preceding unsigned comment by (talk • contribs) 2005-09-26 20:11:23 UTC)
• Delete non-notable group (and ignore votes that say Don't Delete as malformed. As anyone who even scanned this entire page, it's clear the correct format is Keep.) -- 01:03, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unverifiable --TimPope 18:17, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Do Not Delete.) Excuse me but, what do you mean 'sockpuppets aside?' Sockpuppets helped build this country. Sockpuppets are the backbone of society. So the next time you say 'sockpuppets aside,' ask yourself: where would I be today without sockpuppets?

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.