- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:18, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Article is a patent dicdef that already exists on wiktionary. Bfigura (talk) 04:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nom voting to delete per WP:DICDEF. Bfigura (talk) 04:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary, plus there is already an entry at Wiktionary. Blair - Speak to me 04:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Dictionary definition.--Danaman5 05:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per WP:DICDEF. --Hirohisat Kiwi 05:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per above. Fails WP:NOT#DICT. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 06:02, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Obvious. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 09:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a dictionary definition. -- Whpq 14:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per WP:DICDEF Minesweeper.007 (talk · contribs) 20:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:DICDEF. Carlosguitar 05:04, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 06:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 06:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.