- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. UBLP. The Bushranger One ping only 01:20, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Bryan Moore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I tried PROD, but it was disrupted by more blankings (full and partial) from the likely article subject. The deadline for the PROD passed in a partially blanked state, so it did not get deleted. Trying AFD this time, as it is less subject to disruption.
My original PROD reasoning: Notability appears marginal, at best. And a user that is quite likely the article's subject wants it gone. Given this combination, I'm generally inclined to say we can do without the article. TexasAndroid (talk) 20:57, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 20:58, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I agree that notability is marginal at best, and for me, given the lack of sources, I would say he does not meet the inclusion criteria. -- Whpq (talk) 17:27, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.