Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bubble Gum Interactive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:29, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bubble Gum Interactive

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Bubble Gum Interactive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP. A number of the provided sources are not reliable. LibStar (talk) 01:57, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Not notable. RPI2026F1 (talk) 02:58, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, and Australia. AllyD (talk) 08:00, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. On my reading, the page only has 3 arguably reliable sources ([1], [2] and [3]) and even these are questionable as they appear to be simply routine coverage. I can't see this meeting WP:SIRS. Cabrils (talk) 01:39, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.