- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete' Mifter (talk) 00:19, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- BugAware (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable software product by SPA, previously prod'ed. Haakon (talk) 11:40, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Unable to find significant coverage in secondary reliable sources. I searched through a few hundred gHits, nothing reliable. Nothing on gNews, gBooks, or gScholar. A lot of gHits, but none reliable. --Odie5533 (talk) 16:01, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 23:31, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Joe Chill (talk) 23:37, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Lack of RS coverage like above. --Cybercobra (talk) 02:11, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. More non-consumer software with minimal interest outside the programming community, and no significant coverage within it either. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 19:01, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.