- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. I'll leave you guys to rename the article as how you deem fit. :) Mailer Diablo 11:53, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Merge...somewhere...The article is essentially a fork. Jersey Devil 16:56, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with something (I don't know quite what). It is notable, but only within the context of another UN article with more meat. --BWD (talk) 17:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but rename. The episode is probably complex enough that if it were merged elsewhere it would bloat it unreasonably. But the name 'bugging the UN' is absurd. Bucketsofg 18:21, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep — Yes the name needs addressing. — RJH 19:54, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep If bugging the UN isn't meaty, what is? But it could be renamed to Bugging the Security Council or similar for precision. 80.62.76.227 01:40, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as this is a major event for UN-US/UK relations. It shows that NSA is used to spy on much more than just enemy activity, and that no morale apparently is applied since spying was used to further political agendaes. We should NOT hide this major incident in obscure subsections in other articles. A human 03:42, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: It sounds a little sensationalized. And surveillance of diplomats is not really unexpected, although I imagine it's a violation of something. And the title is awful; maybe NSA UN diplomat electronic surveillance? Does the media have a catchy name for it? Peter Grey 08:16, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename - not the best name ever --Larsinio 21:12, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- "Keep" & '"Rename'" - some thing like 'Electronic Surveillance of UN 2002' it's an important part of history -PLawrence99cx 21:47, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.