- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Snow Delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:52, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Bugok Hawaii (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A contested prod. Reason given on the prod was,
"No demonstration of notability per the general notability guideline." Rotten regard (talk) 20:50, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete my PROD, missed the last one. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 22:49, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is some swimming pool in Korea. Not notable. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 23:10, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:BUILDING -Drdisque (talk) 01:15, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Just noticed that WP:BUILDING isn't policy, regardless, fails GNG. -Drdisque (talk) 20:45, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete, no notability, no references.Vulcan's Forge (talk) 01:17, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:44, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This topic is not meeting the threshold of notability for a Wikipedia article. I found this article which appears to be a short entry ([1]), but additional coverage appears to consist of only directory listings (e.g. [2], [3], [4]) and passing mentions (e.g. Frommers). Northamerica1000(talk) 16:41, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.