Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Building the Dam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 18:05, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable web forum that fails WP:WEB. Prod removed after prod and prod2. Gwernol 15:57, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, NN, it's some blog. Tempshill 16:02, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --nathanbeach 16:17, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom Dina 16:23, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. A smidgin of research on this subject reveals that Building the Dam has swept this nation by storm. A quick google search returns half-a-million hits, revealing that this blog has wide and far-reaching exposure. --ForbiddenWord 16:36, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Eminently non-notable. A quick google search for the website returns 120 hits, 10 unique. Searching for the phrase, "building the dam" returns half a million hits about construction of water retention systems. Fan-1967 16:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment to the contrary, a search for "Building the dam" blog, will return nearly 400,000 hits. --ForbiddenWord 16:58, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, but most of those are not about the subject of this article. This search which is mainly references to the blog in question only return 13,400 results, the vast majority of which are not reliable sources they're just links from other blogs. Gwernol 17:07, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:WEB. Alexa shows no rank whatsoever. --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 17:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:WEB. Also no alexa rank, very little on Google. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:WEB. Website was founded in the last seven months and has no alexa rank? Unless author(s) can cite verifiable sources establishing notability, this should be deleted as Not Notable. Scorpiondollprincess 19:01, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and WP:WEB. Diagonalfish 20:49, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:WEB. Please, just take it behind the shed and put it out of it's misery. WilyD 20:58, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.