- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. --Titoxd(?!?) 04:18, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Tagged as copyvio, but I can't find it online, and neither could the tagger. Is just one big horrific ad, however, which WP:ISNOT. -Splashtalk 00:10, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Ad. utcursch | talk 04:24, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Burn all ads and flush the ashes. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 06:28, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, blatant ad. - Mgm|(talk) 08:05, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless someone thinks it's important enough to rewrite -- ads have no place at Wikipedia, ever. --Jacqui ★ 14:27, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, shoot authors and burn the bodies. - Just zis Guy, you know? 14:46, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete but do not shoot anyone. Shooting people is sometimes illegal in the United States. --TantalumTelluride 20:51, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Newyorktimescrossword 04:09, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. --Meiers Twins 11:05, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment article is an orphan.Geni 13:05, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.