Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buildings breeding

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 17:21, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Buildings breeding (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable band exists more on the internet than anywhere else. Someone removed the speedy delete tag, said they could make a case for notability. This is their chance. Speciate 23:17, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete--that is: delete unless somebody has more luck finding notability on this band that I have. The page claims that "the band’s album debuted at #6 on the charts for CMJ (College Music Journal) and stayed in the top 100 for nearly two months." I tried a search on CMJ but it said "No review, news or feature matches for Buildings breeding." I don't see an option for searching historical charts. --Moonriddengirl 23:29, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete. They're signed to Mushpot Records, which isn't notable enough to have a Wikipedia entry (as I type this). They only have one album out. They have played Northern California and SXSW. They do have an entry at artistdirect.com, but not at allmusic.com. Not quite up to WP:BAND yet. Corvus cornix 23:45, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.