Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BuiltX (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted‎. By Pickersgill-Cunliffe under CSD G4. (non-admin closure) ZyphorianNexus Talk 13:57, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BuiltX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was previously deleted for failing WP:GNG and WP:NCORP here. The recreated version still lacks reliable, independent sources that provide significant coverage per WP:SIGCOV. After a WP:BEFORE check, most of the coverage of the company appears to be sponsored content or brief mentions. It's a non-notable company, and I don't think much has changed since the last deletion. ZyphorianNexus Talk 13:32, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.