Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulgarian property bubble
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:30, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bulgarian property bubble (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Original research - no evidence that the subject exists. As the article says: There were rumors and speculations... Nk (talk) 18:57, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. Nk (talk) 18:58, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:31, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete there isn't any indication that "speculation about a Bulgarian property bubble" is notable, either. Walt Yoder (talk) 22:27, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously deleted by WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:38, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: The PROD deletion of an earlier instance had the rationale "original theory not supported by WP:RS" which seems equally applicable to this instance. The most solid ground here is the referenced final paragraph, which notes that a significant proportion of property purchases have involved foreign buyers, preceded by some uncited mention that the Global financial crisis depressed the property market (which I don't doubt: in Bulgaria as everywhere). The reference added in 2021 does not support the overall speculative premise of the article. As an article, this is unsatisfactory whether in describing a well-founded event nor the fear of a potential event: in the absence of either, this fails WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 20:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.