- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:02, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Unverified slang usage (WP:WINAD even if it were verified) / advert for non-notable blog. Repeated anonymous removals of afd tag [1] confirm even further that it's some kind of vanity entry. Tearlach 00:32, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Can someone hurry up action on this? I'm getting bored with reverting to the afd version against anonymous users edit-warring. Tearlach 23:06, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per nom.--Dakota t e 19:23, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Neologism. ••MDD4696 ( talk - contribs ) 22:28, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom.--nixie 00:26, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete it! Advertisement and stolen topics. -unsigned comment by 82.6.0.19 (talk · contribs)
- Delete; neologism term, combined with "ad" for non-notable blog. *Dan T.* 19:09, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep 194.247.226.254 18:17, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.