- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Gazimoff 14:39, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Burgers plot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Possible hoax, or at the least, something made up one day. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:00, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as violating WP:CRYSTAL as being plot info from an unreleased book/movie, etc. Also, it is a possible hoax. Pie is good (Apple is the best) 00:16, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources provided, probably something made up. KJS77 Join the Revolution 00:21, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nonsense. Apparently, there is such a thing as a water bridge, but what this article is trying to convey is beyond me. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:50, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I like my burgers cooked medium and my articles well done. I've got a burger ready for dinner, but this article isn't well done -- in fact, it seem like a bit of a hoax. Ecoleetage (talk) 01:09, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I agree this looks suspiciously like something made up one day. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:48, 22 September 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete - For the record, I doubt this is a hoax- it looks to me to be a copy 'n' paste of a fragment fragment from a pre-publication chem or biochem paper. Has to do with measuring the strength of intermolecular bonds in organic molecules- the A. von Hell mentioned is likely Albert von Hell, who is apparently a bio professor at Utrecht University. That being said, it seems that the Burgers Plot being mentioned (just a plot of the number of molecules participating in a networked bond over time, apparently) is unlikely to be notable enough to warrant its own article. I suspect someone read a pre-print of the paper, didn't recognize the mentioned item, and created a stubby article in the hopes that it would get filled in with more details. --Clay Collier (talk) 06:42, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- first of all mr. ten pound hammer i worked together with albert van hell on the article. second, i created much of the data. third, of the data created i thought of this specific plot for showing water bridges. water bridges can't be seen on a youtube video as they cannot even be seen with many of the instruments we have in our lab. i used molecular dynamics to create the data and then to portray in such a plot. I just became member of wikipedia so was not able to post any picture of what the plot looks like yet. Also, what i wrote did not come out of any article. so go cook your own burgers you bum student. oh yeah, and some of the professors that saw the plot named it the burgers plot in reference to my name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pepijnb (talk • contribs)
- Note that user blanked page and replaced it with the above comment. I have restored the page and placed the comment here. Make of it what you will. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:19, 22 September 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete Author admits WP:COI and WP:OWN violations in the comment above. Article not only fails those but WP:NOTWEBHOST. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 14:03, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all of many good reasons listed above. This article is definitely not well done. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 20:08, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'll have one hoax-burger with ketchup and mustard and a glass of Dihydrogen monoxide to drink. Erik the Red 2 ~~~~ 01:37, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:03, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As can be seen here Burgher_people, with only approximately 100,000 people of Burgher descent, it would challenging to plot them on any type of graph (trying to out-humour Eco??). Besides that, it's poorly written, badly sourced, probably WP:COI and extremely hard to try and cook up a fix for. BMW(drive) 18:35, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I came here hoping for something that could at least be redirected to Burgers' equation, but that appears not to be the case. - Eldereft (cont.) 19:27, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Probably not a hoax. I wonder if this is an unsuccessful attempt at writing a description page for an image that couldn't be uploaded. Try wikimedia commons instead or something if you want to share a picture. Narayanese (talk) 04:30, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.