Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bursty transmission
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Burst transmission. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:54, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Bursty transmission (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Original research. Appears to be the author's own explanation for the prevalence of burst transmission. PROD (and seconded PROD) removed by author. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:45, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per nom. Laval (talk) 13:45, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - As per nom Eduemoni↑talk↓ 16:29, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Article is essentially a dictionary definition. Redirect to Burst transmission; there doesn't appear to be anything useful to merge. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:44, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Burst transmission. Bursty transmission implies Burstiness in the transmission statistics; all burst transmissions are bursty by design, so this article doesn't add anything new to the topic of Burst transmission. As with Mike Rosoft, I don't find anything useful to merge. --Mark viking (talk) 18:33, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - seems reasonable Fbryce (talk) 03:33, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.