Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bus Routes In Braintree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete all.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  11:32, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles listing bus service details for every settlement are not encylopedic and repeat existing articles about each settlement and articles about county-wide travel such as List of bus routes in London and List of bus routes in Essex. All articles should redirect to the county-wide lists.

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:

• Bus Routes In Brentwood
• Bus Routes In Chigwell
• Bus Routes In Chingford
• Bus Routes In Clacton
• Bus Routes In Epping
• Bus Routes In Hythe (Kent)
• Bus Routes In Loughton
• Bus Routes In New Romney
• Bus Routes In North Weald
• Bus Routes In Ongar
• Bus Routes In Romford

Mrsteviec 22:24, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I think we should keep North Weald and get rid of the rest. george 22:39, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • That article duplicates North Weald. Mrsteviec 22:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all, Wikipedia is not a bus schedule. --Coredesat talk 22:54, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all per nom. ~ Matticus78 23:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all because they should be part of more comprehensive lists for wider regions if anything. SM247 04:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all per nom. Besides, saying my bus route has a bus every 10 minutes is pure fantasy. --Richhoncho 09:57, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge - Make the larger scale articles better and sectioned. Ace of Risk 16:59, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete these are basically a description of the city and then bus schedules. No one cares about bus schedules on Wikipedia. —Mets501 (talk) 17:09, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all per nom.--Fuhghettaboutit 17:13, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Computerjoe's talk 18:29, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all per nom. Buscruft. --DaveG12345 23:28, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I agree that Wikipedia is not a bus schedule. A simple link from the towns article to an outside address might be a better idea. --SpeechFreedom 00:31, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all per nom. Unencyclopedic. --kingboyk 10:54, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge all to List of bus routes in Essex except Chingford which should be merged to List of bus routes in London. MLA 11:00, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all Non-encyclopaedic. Bus routes change periodically and are usually available via a commercial website that will be kept up to date. This article is likely not to be. Peterkingiron 23:42, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.