Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business Style: Word Choice, Conciseness and Tone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 20:22, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Business Style: Word Choice, Conciseness and Tone

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems more of an essay/how to instead of an article. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 18:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Also original research. Lugia2453 (talk) 18:32, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination, possibly a speedy deletion candidate as a duplicate of Style guide. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:35, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTGUIDE — JJJ (talk) 19:17, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I echo NOTGUIDE . This article is written exactly as one. Fylbecatulous talk 14:58, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Original research. Wikipedia is not a web host for guides.--xanchester (t) 23:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTGUIDE. I also suspect a cut and paste copyright violation, but can't work out from where. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:10, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.