Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business service visualization

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted as G11 after I tagged it as such (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 19:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Business service visualization

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Neither of the cited sources (second link is dead, but can be accessed by the wayback machine) mentions the phrase "Business service visualization". Very little coverage not just in reliable sources, but in any sources other than WP mirrors. There is one exception I could find: a brief from 2011 put out by CA Technologies, which uses the phrase twice in total. I don't think this coverage is sufficient to meet WP:WORDISSUBJECT (although this is a phrase the above guideline still seems to apply). Given that there is little evidence of this phrase meeting any other notability guidelines, like GNG, I think this page should be deleted. Everymorning (talk) 06:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 06:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.