- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Bryce (talk | contribs) 02:42, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Butte potato (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:Notability Callanecc (talk) 16:01, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sources (for example):
- USDA American potato journal 1992
- BHG Plant Dictionary: Potato
- Russet Potato
- Charlie Nardozzi. Vegetable Gardening for Dummies. John Wiley, 2009. "This late-season variety is the classic Idaho baking potato. It's a great russeted (has rough, brown-colored skin) baking variety that features 20 percent more protein and 58 percent more vitamin C than other varieties. It's also tolerant of scab disease and late blight." (page 79)
- Keep - variety exists and has adequate sources as shown above. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:13, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Variety exists, references exist in books and in google scholar. Why was this even nominated for deletion? Pseudofusulina (talk) 19:37, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - It establishes notability in the article. Rkitko (talk) 19:53, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - For the reasons given above.--Curtis Clark (talk) 22:21, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.