- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy keep - no basis to delete. ➨ ЯЄDVERS 18:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just an unimportant character from some crappy TV show. Newspaper99 17:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep per baseless, bad faith nomination. (User's edits are all listing articles for deletion using this (and similar) rationale). -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 17:59, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep, notable character NawlinWiki 18:08, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep, close all of thse AfD discussions, and give a stern warning to User:Newspaper99. Just because you don't like something doesn't mean it's undeserving of an article. -- Kicking222 18:46, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.