Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Button (unit)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 20:17, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Button (unit) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Even though I've just spent some time trying to develop this from its previous state, I don't think there's anything reliable to verify its existence. (Cardarelli, he of the Stupping ton, is dubious for reliability). Not an asset to the encyclopedia. PamD 15:20, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This is either a mistake or a very non-notable unit. There is no encyclopedic information available beyond a dictionary definition (1 button = half an inch) in one dubious source. Johnuniq (talk) 23:18, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I think there is some confusion here. The ligne is a traditional unit of measure (about 1/40 of an inch) for buttons, and in that sense is a button measure. But I don't think there has ever been an actual unit called the button, only ligne in Germany and UK, which morphed into line in the US. The unit ligne itself seems notable, with button measurement charts from Britex and Natural Buttons still using this unit. --Mark viking (talk) 23:04, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Yay! More Cardarelli units to kill! Delete, for the same reasons as the dozens we have already nuked. Non notable. PianoDan (talk) 20:21, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.