Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buttrock (3rd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 23:47, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Buttrock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Looks to fail WP:NEO. Although this term shows up in various rock publications, it lacks a solid secondary source to prove its notability as a trend or genre. The Interior (Talk) 20:27, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The one source cited was created as a humorous attack on certain bands. It is not a reliable source. The one external link to a college newspaper is an opinion piece and not by anyone who is established as notable or a reliable source. This whole thing is clearly meant as a derogatory joke about the bands and the people who like them and there were no reliable sources supplied to even justify notability. SQGibbon (talk) 20:47, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:58, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This article seems to be a misrepresentation of a humor piece, for the purpose of, as SQGibbon points out, disparaging certain bands. RadManCF ☢ open frequency 23:44, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This is a joke article that probably should have been speedied under some criterion or another. "Butt rock" is a term that has been around for 15 or 20 years, a slag description of so-called "Classic Rock," used mostly by punk rockers and various alternative rock folk... Carrite (talk) 03:42, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirecting to Classic rock would actually be the best way to dispose of this. By the way, how was this NOT deleted in two previous tries?!?!? Carrite (talk) 03:54, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It was deleted after number two, this is a recreation. Redirecting to Classic rock might discourage future recreation, as an admin would have to nuke the redirect before a new recreation could be started. The Interior (Talk) 04:04, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Reading the article and the webpage that the article links to it does not appear that buttrock and classic rock are synonymous. SQGibbon (talk) 15:39, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, from searches it seems to variously be used to describe hair metal, glam rock, top-40 packaged rock, christian rock, and rock played by people "with hair down to their butts". Its seems like a very amorphous term. I think it keeps getting used because it's so pleasant to say. Butt yeah, the redirect would be difficult. The Interior (Talk) 10:28, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, there's an article on hair metal?!?! Post-classic rock cheese metal, perfect... That's the best redirect. Carrite (talk) 06:32, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I see the actual article name is glam metal. That's spot-on for a redirect. The phrase doesn't equate to original 1970s glam or Christian rock. Carrite (talk) 06:35, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, there's an article on hair metal?!?! Post-classic rock cheese metal, perfect... That's the best redirect. Carrite (talk) 06:32, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, from searches it seems to variously be used to describe hair metal, glam rock, top-40 packaged rock, christian rock, and rock played by people "with hair down to their butts". Its seems like a very amorphous term. I think it keeps getting used because it's so pleasant to say. Butt yeah, the redirect would be difficult. The Interior (Talk) 10:28, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Reading the article and the webpage that the article links to it does not appear that buttrock and classic rock are synonymous. SQGibbon (talk) 15:39, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It was deleted after number two, this is a recreation. Redirecting to Classic rock might discourage future recreation, as an admin would have to nuke the redirect before a new recreation could be started. The Interior (Talk) 04:04, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirecting to Classic rock would actually be the best way to dispose of this. By the way, how was this NOT deleted in two previous tries?!?!? Carrite (talk) 03:54, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, for the reasons listed. --Shovan Luessi (talk) 09:22, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.