- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:26, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- C. Kenneth Lee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable musician failing WP:ENTERTAINER, WP:NMUSIC, WP:CREATIVE, WP:GNG, etc. This article was deleted in October on a prod. After the prod had expired, but before an admin had deleted the article, the article's creator, User:Dialogues88, who is probably WP:AUTO but most certainly WP:COI, vandalized the prod template. He also committed vandalism by blanking my user page [1]. After the deletion, the creator was warned not to recreate the article, but did so again in December, without adding anything new to indicate notability. For all of these reasons, I recommend a good salting of the article, and a permanent block on User:Dialogues88 for disruptive blanking and disruptive article recreation. Qworty (talk) 20:53, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The Google Books and News archives hits in question all look like directory-type stuff. Salt it for good measure. I agree that the conduct of Dialogues88 has been unacceptable, but AfD isn't the venue to try and get him indef-blocked. CtP (t • c) 22:29, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JayJayWhat did I do? 01:25, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not notable.--Staberinde (talk) 18:29, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.