- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to canting keels. MBisanz talk 23:54, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- CBTF Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Whether loooking under the new or old names for the company, there are some ghits but nothing that establishes notability. I declined the speedy on this some months ago as I thought that maybe the involvement with the Sydney-Hobart race might be a claim to notability but in revisiting it, I'm not seeing clear evidence to pass WP:CORP. StarM 01:06, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- StarM 01:06, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- StarM 01:06, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I still think it should be retained in some form or other. I'm not going to argue that this is the best form, but I don't really see the harm in keeping it as is.
At any rate, you seem to disagree.
As an alternative, perhaps we could at least have a redirect from CBTF to Canting Keel, and add to the Canting Keel page a mention of at least Canting Ballast Twin Foil, and perhaps even CBTF Technology. Could you indicate whether there is a problem with that?
Esb (talk) 00:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: six months has passed since it got tagged for a rewrite. Now, still no reputable sources given. Alexius08 (talk) 00:55, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.