- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Runcorn 09:01, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Almost-copyvio ad for a corporation whose rather awkward name gets only 700 Google hits, top of which is Wikipedia. Not such a great advertising strategy. Opabinia regalis 05:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- But would we be adding to the systemic bias if we were to delete this article about a company in India? See Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias. Would it not be better to wikify it, and rewrite it (and correct its name)? DFH 17:12, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- We would be adding to the systemic bias by doing what you imply, saying that companies in India get an automatic excemption from the standards that companies in all other countries are held to. If you wish to make an argument for keeping this article that holds water, please cite sources to demonstrate that the WP:CORP criteria are satisfied. Uncle G 13:21, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nothing in the article suggests that this is an encyclopedicly notable company. (This is nothing to with where they're from, just that there doesn't appear to be anything very special or unique about the company.) Zaxem 02:23, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Following comments from Uncle G. DFH 20:36, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.