Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CINTAX (3rd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Black Kite 23:07, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- CINTAX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Still unsourced after two years and two AfDs. I think we should call time, unless those who want the article are actually going to make it compliant with policy. Guy (Help!) 12:53, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No significant coverage appears to exist.--Michig (talk) 14:07, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Added a ref. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 15:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. SilverserenC 06:49, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. SilverserenC 06:49, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless better references are found. So far, there are I believe two from the vendor and the rest are pages from universities and colleges who appear to be customers. I do not believe this are sufficient to establish notability. --Nuujinn (talk) 22:20, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Nuujinn and nom.4meter4 (talk) 06:55, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.