- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Enochlau 00:55, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Article title is a neologism, contents are fictional DannyWilde 04:10, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. --DannyWilde 04:14, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I would just observe that all Google hits for "CJK Triangle" are derivatives or direct mirrors of Wikipedia. Can someone tell us whether this is simply systemic bias (by provided a decent usage of it or two) or whether it is, in fact, a 'logism? -Splashtalk 04:28, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per DannyWilde. I strongly believe this is a neologism; I have never encountered the term once in many years of activity in communities related to East Asian popular culture. — Haeleth Talk 14:55, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. worthawholebean talkcontribs 15:39, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.