- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- CODIX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Software company, no real indication of notability, google throws up a few not very significant products, blatant COI from creator Jac16888Talk 05:29, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:01, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Alan - talk 21:53, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, unambiguous advertising: introducing on the market iMX -a new concept of “events based management of cases”. You get that? There are cases. Those cases have something to do with events. These events are used to manage them. This is a new concept. And they'll take care of it for you, if you just throw money. Also, no minimal claim of importance. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:31, 9 February 2010 (UTC) [reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:CORP as written. Pcap ping 16:34, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.