- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 22:57, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- CRiSP Editor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Could not establish notability (google, alexa). Probably not even eligible for an article. Written as ad since July 2008. Referours (talk) 13:41, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - One of hundreds of non-notable editors out there made by hundreds of small software companies. Canterbury Tail talk 15:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - It seemed notable at one point (in the early 1990s), but its vendor (see the edit history) doesn't help. Tedickey (talk) 21:38, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:49, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Brief (text editor)#Clones as a plausible search target. Verifiable, but the only in-depth independent source I was able to find was the same article in Linux Journal that our article already cites. —Korath (Talk) 03:10, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.