Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CSP Music Group (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:51, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- CSP Music Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Primary, social media and brief mentions. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to support meeting WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 19:51, 16 August 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, and Georgia (U.S. state). Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:36, 16 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - A search did not come up with anything meeting WP:ORGCRIT. I also find it strange that despite the name dropping on the page, the few sources I did find that even verify it exists is all local. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:11, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - I can't verify the many significant claims in this article. It is highly promotional, and as I can't verify them I find them dubious. Fails WP:V. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 22:45, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG let alone WP:ORGCRIT. I came up empty handed in digging for sources.4meter4 (talk) 19:43, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.