Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CTU Director of Field Ops

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 01:29, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CTU Director of Field Ops

The page re-creates Information avaliable else where on wikipedia. It does not add any value to the encyclopedia as a whole and would be better suited to 24 Wikia. The page is virtually orphaned andis not linked on any of the major 24 pages. The page is also in horrible need of upadting, activity levels are low and it contains a large amount of original research. I think the following policies are voilated with this page, WP:NOTABLE, WP:NOT#INFO and although not strictly policy WP:FAN Lucy-marie (talk) 01:03, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

comment please also see The Government in 24 (TV) Lucy-marie (talk) 15:25, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: More Fancruft. - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:22, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. jj137 (Talk) 02:03, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above Ctjf83 03:07, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Suffers bad writing. Doesn't explain the position particularly well and should be made into a list of CTU Directors of Field Ops put in alphabetical order with the relevant days mentioned with each name rather than the other way around. Alternative better solution. Make or find a list of minor characters in 24 and make one sorted by function/position rather than alphabetical order for ease of reference. - Mgm|^(talk) 00:30, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as original research, and as failing WP:N. Edison (talk) 02:13, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Love 24, hate unnecessary articles that reiterate the plot of the show in an in-universe way. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 03:38, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per Edison and Judgesurreal777. asyndeton (talk) 10:49, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.