Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CTVN AKD Plus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. "Has x zillion Google hits" is one of the most notoriously bad AfD arguments, because it tells us nothing about the nature or value of these sources. Any fish go to Toddst1. Sandstein 18:51, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CTVN AKD Plus

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Google does not show anything either, except for Android apps, channel lists, videos, addresses etc.—J. M. (talk) 22:14, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. J. M. (talk) 22:22, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: A quick click on the {{Find sources AFD}} template above shows 86,900 results. Suggest this be withdrawn by nominator per WP:BEFORE and WP:TROUT applied. Toddst1 (talk) 22:25, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions before commenting in deletion discussions. In particular, please read WP:GOOGLEHITS. Number of Google hits is completely irrelevant. Have you actually looked at the "sources" or read my reason? None of the sources are usable for establishing notability. BTW, my Google search says "91,200 sources", but the actual result is only 6 pages long, that is, 60 actual search results, and all results are useless. I suggest you withdraw your "keep" comment, as it's obviously based on complete misunderstanding of both the Wikipedia deletion process and the search results.—J. M. (talk) 22:43, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:55, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Significant coverage in the news is not fully established. WP:GNG is not metCatorce2016 (talk) 07:06, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 10:45, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a WP:TNT case if we can't find out what the network carries and more sources aren't found. It's an existing channel, but more than WP:ITEXISTS is needed here; we need concrete information about who carries it, what it airs and if people have written about it besides 'show premiere, here's the PR for it'. Nate • (chatter) 00:02, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.