- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 20:42, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- CURO (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced, does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (software) recomendations or our general notability guidelines Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 11:25, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 11:32, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, no 3rd party reference, just an official website and three lists of unclear unsorted items allegedly related to the subject in some undefined way. –Be..anyone (talk) 15:52, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. Refs provided are company sites, not WP:RS, and a search turned up no significant independent coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 01:17, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete- non-notable software. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:14, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.