Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CU Backslash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:19, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete PRODed by User:Ifnord as non-notable podcast on 3/23. PROD removed by User:BinaryCleric (page creator) without comment. I slapped on a mergeto tag to send it to Clarion University, as I don't think it is independently notable. Ifnord merged & redirected it. BinaryCleric unmerged it and restored it, saying "Leave my page alone." I truthfully don't know whether it is best to delete or merge, but it SHOULDN'T be a stand-alone article and BinaryCleric has problems with WP:OWN Karnesky 00:37, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete, per original page author's delete vote. --Karnesky 17:06, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• See, also Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Backslash_Podcasting_Group--Karnesky 00:39, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as nn podcast. What assertion of notability - above "it features on iTunes" (which, I believe, anyone can request; ie does not prove notability) is there? If none, the policy says delete. Batmanand | Talk 00:47, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as advertising. Author's description of article as "my page" pretty much proves that. --Hyperbole 00:56, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as nn podcast. Royboycrashfan 00:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, non-notable podcast. Might change my vote if it gets changed from being "distributed on all major podcast distribution mediums" to being distributed on all major radio stations. :P — Kimchi.sg | Talk 01:03, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 01:25, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• I know the policy for ownership on Wikipedia, I just feel like all of you are attacking my work. People (fans of our podcast) will bring it back if it is deleted. --BinaryCleric
  • Comment: Tell them to bring it back only if they can state how notable or encyclopedic it is, otherwise an admin may protect it from being re-created. — Kimchi.sg | Talk 04:01, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • The criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia is not truth, but notability. We are not saying that your podcast does not "exist" or is not "good", just that at the present time it is not notable enough for the Wikipedia guidelines. Batmanand | Talk 11:33, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete; no one's attacking anything, it's just that the subject isn't notable or encyclopedic. --Kinu ^t/_c 02:51, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete pod casts should be speedied in the same way as blogs, if nothings done to assert notability, IMHO ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 07:25, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, nn podcast. We should include podcasts on CSD or have a policy/ guideline on them. --Terence Ong 09:32, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete nowhere near notable. --Soumyasch 09:37, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable vanity. Ifnord 13:02, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, if you feel it's a violation of the rules then fine. I wasn't aware that notability was enforced this much, I was simply trying to post an artical about my podcast which has brough about change (for the better) to Clarion University. If it violates these rules then I will wait until we have met one of the conditions for notability and then repost, if that is okay. BinaryCleric
• Delete per all above. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 15:57, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn podcast. *drew 16:06, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Blogs/podcasts generally need national media coverage for my vote. Deizio 16:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn podcast + above. --Jay(Reply) 22:06, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as redirect to nonexistent article. --BinaryTed 15:14, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.