- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:33, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- C Ravichandran (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Vanity article sourced only to the subject's own website and a Facebook page, failing all notability criteria that according to the article would be relevant, from the general notability guidelines to the notability guidelines for writers and academics. Thomas.W talk 15:56, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:12, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:12, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- We do see that Ravichandran C, the alternate version in the text, had been speedily deleted in the past. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:14, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This is a poorly sourced advertisement with unverifiable statements and no understanding of the rules of English-language capitalization. Tigercompanion25 (talk) 17:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - completely non-notable. Engleham (talk) 22:21, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.