Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caffeine logic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 13:15, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be a neologism and possibly original research. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 05:14, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per the above. Also dictdef and slang. Durova 05:58, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete dicdef, neologism. -GTBacchus^(talk) 11:27, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. -- JJay 22:18, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Mergeto Can it be slipped into the caffeine article somewhere? - Chriszuma 04:26, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.