- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LFaraone 02:32, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Cage Rage 11 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article(s) fails WP:SPORTSEVENT as it largely contains only statistics (in the form of event results) and lacks well-sourced prose. The only sources I could find were WP:ROUTINE fight announcements and match/event results. TreyGeek (talk) 02:46, 21 May 2013 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reasons:[reply]
- Cage Rage 12 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Cage Rage 13 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Cage Rage 14 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
I am intentionally restricting this AfD to these four articles (rather than including the nine other Cage Rage event articles) in hopes of ensuring anyone who wishes to argue in favor of keeping any of these article has time to find references and sufficient coverage of the events. --TreyGeek (talk) 02:51, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. TreyGeek (talk) 02:51, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all These articles consist almost solely of fight results for a second tier MMA organization's events. Each article has only a line or two of text and no significant coverage, merely routine sports reporting. These events also fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. Papaursa (talk) 22:02, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all The previous comments have said it all--there's merely routine sports coverage of events that fail WP:SPORTSEVENT.Mdtemp (talk) 16:30, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all - No significative coverage, fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. LlamaAl (talk) 18:43, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete All - Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT and all the coverage is WP:ROUTINE with nothing to indicate why these events have any sort of enduring notability. CaSJer (talk) 20:27, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.