- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Philippe 04:38, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- CalSERVE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not-notable student government political party. SevernSevern (talk) 17:49, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no independent, reliable sources to show notability. JohnCD (talk) 13:31, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep This party's very notable. They're the (as of today) ruling party of a historically important university's student government. Plus, having this article doesn't decrease the importance of other articles, as it would in a paper encyclopedia.SteveSims (talk) 03:40, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment That does not establish notability. Try to find some reliable secondary sources to establish notability. Wikipedia is not a web-host for the history of a student political party.--SevernSevern (talk) 04:26, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Clearly, Wikipedia is not a web-host for the history of a student political party. It is an encyclopedia that is not limited by the amount of pages that can fit in a book, so it is able to have a plethora of less common information without diminishing the importance of more common information. Thus, it can contain information about a major student political party from a major university without diminishing, say, the Democratic Party article.
- Comment That does not establish notability. Try to find some reliable secondary sources to establish notability. Wikipedia is not a web-host for the history of a student political party.--SevernSevern (talk) 04:26, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete - WP:IS, WP:V, and WP:NOT. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 20:58, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:17, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:17, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:17, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as failing WP:ORG. Mention can be made in the Associated Students of the University of California page which badly needs content. TerriersFan (talk) 01:25, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of university deletions. —SevernSevern (talk) 14:47, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per Mr Senseless. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 17:53, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 02:15, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.