- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:56, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Caliber Point (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Highly promotional article, references are essentially PR and do not prove notability . Rejected from AfC some time ago, but moved into mainspace anyway without addressing the objections DGG ( talk ) 04:33, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:41, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. If it is kept it should be stubbified as its mostly promotional and unsourced. Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:54, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - yeah, lots of stuff that seems to have been derived from press releases and company announcements, not so much in the way of independent coverage. Stalwart111 14:01, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.