Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Call of duty 4 multiplayer ranks
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and redirect to Call of Duty 4. If anyone wants the table for a CoD Wiki (which I'm sure exists or will exist), drop by my talk page.-Wafulz (talk) 23:43, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Call of duty 4 multiplayer ranks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
My PROD rationale: Wikipedia is not the place for in-game statistics; it is WP:NOT#indiscriminate information.
Prod removed by an anonymous user with the reason: Wikipedia does not state that in game statistics cannot be included. It is your opinion that in game statistics do not belong on Wikipedia, not a rule. Marasmusine (talk) 09:57, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Marasmusine (talk) 09:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - We need a CSD for this. User:Krator (t c) 10:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not a WP:GAMEGUIDE --Breno talk 10:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above, and agree with Krator. Dreaded Walrus t c 10:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, because unsourced and is simply a statistics list without context or any indication of why this is of any use to anyone. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 13:32, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete based on everything already said. GtstrickyTalk or C 14:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per everyone else. Wikipedia is not a game guide. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 15:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. PROD rationale was entirely correct. Pagrashtak 16:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per previous reasons. -Mastrchf91- 22:17, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.